Minnesota Supreme Court Rules that Biology is “Facially Discriminatory”

This week, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that it is “facially discriminatory” for USA Powerlifting to prohibit a man from competing against women. Yes, you read that right — according to the court, enforcing the simple biological distinction between male and female athletes is now considered discrimination.

Let’s be honest here: the real discrimination is against women who are forced to compete in an arena where fairness no longer matters, biology no longer counts, and truth is treated as hate.

The decision was celebrated by activists who insist that a man’s feelings determine his gender and that women must simply accept it, even in sports that depend entirely on physical strength and biological difference. The case involves a biological male who claims he feels like a woman and demanded to compete in the women’s division of USA Powerlifting. Instead of standing up for women, the court ruled that excluding him was “facially discriminatory” under Minnesota law.

If the members of this court were not blinded by radical ideology, they would know that biology is not bias. It’s reality. And when a court declares that reality itself is illegal, it reveals something much deeper than a bad legal opinion — it exposes the moral decay that comes when truth is replaced by ideology.

This is not just about Minnesota

If a state court can declare it discrimination to keep men out of women’s sports, how long before other courts decide it’s discrimination to protect children from chemical castration or to defend unborn life?

This is exactly why we cannot trust the courts to do what is right. Time and again, activist judges have proven they will side with radical ideology over reason, biology, or basic human decency.

The same legal philosophy that brought us Roe v. Wade and redefined marriage is now being used to erase womanhood altogether. When the law abandons truth, it ceases to protect and becomes a weapon in the hands of those who despise it.

The Missouri Difference: Why We Must Pass Amendment 3

This ruling is a warning shot to every state that still believes in truth and family. Here in Missouri, we have a chance to stand up and say Enough.

Amendment 3 will protect Missouri’s children and families from the same kind of judicial madness we’re seeing in Minnesota. It will ensure that our laws are written with clarity, not left to activist courts to twist into something unrecognizable.

When judges declare that it’s discriminatory to recognize the difference between men and women, they prove why the people, not unelected elites, must set moral boundaries in law.

Passing Amendment 3 means drawing a line that cannot be erased by judicial activism. It means standing up for women, protecting children, and restoring common sense to our state’s constitution.

The Bottom Line

When courts call truth hate and fairness discrimination, the people must act. Missouri can and must lead the way by passing Amendment 3.

Let Minnesota’s decision serve as a reminder of what happens when we fail to defend the truth: men take women’s places, courts rewrite biology, and the meaning of justice is lost entirely.

We will not let that happen here.
Missouri stands for truth. Missouri stands for women. Missouri stands for life.

Take Action

✅ Volunteer to support Amendment 3
✅ Share this article with your church, friends, and community
✅ Donate today to help MO Protects fight back against activist courts and gender ideology

Together, we can make sure Missouri remains a state where truth still matters.