Olympics Finally Discovers Biology: Ban on Men in Women's Sports Looms for 2028—Missouri Can't Afford to Wait

In a revelation on par with discovering the sky is blue, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) is reportedly preparing to declare what every Missouri parent has observed since tee-ball: Biological males possess a decisive physical advantage in women's sports. After years of relying on arbitrary testosterone limits to feign equity, the IOC—led by president Kirsty Coventry—is advancing a blanket ban on men competing in the female category for the 2028 Los Angeles Games.

Sources confirm the policy is firmly the "direction of travel," with rollout anticipated in 6–12 months. This would preclude scenarios like New Zealand's Laurel Hubbard, who “transitioned” in 2012 and entered women's weightlifting at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics. Coventry, who campaigned to "protect the female category," is addressing a glaring oversight—though, sadly, the rule will not apply to the February 2026 Winter Games in Italy.

The decision aligns with President Trump's February 2025 executive order prohibiting men from female sports on U.S. soil, sidestepping potential conflicts before the LA event. Last week in Lausanne, IOC medical director Dr. Jane Thornton presented a "science-based review" separating men who identify as women from those with differences of sexual development (DSD). The ban on men progresses, but DSD eligibility lingers amid internal resistance—potentially repeating the 2024 Paris boxing controversy, where Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting secured gold after failing prior gender tests.

The IOC maintains no final rulings, yet the trajectory is unmistakable: After widespread backlash and empirical evidence, even Olympic officials can no longer deny fundamental biology.

The DSD Evasion: Partial Solutions Fail Missouri Girls

Banning men is progress—but insufficient. The IOC's indecision on DSD athletes (biological males raised as female) sustains the flawed premise behind Paris 2024's mismatched bouts. Missouri families require no further "working groups" to affirm what basic physiology demonstrates: Advantages persist regardless of a piece of paper or claims of identity.

Missouri's Critical Mandate: Amendment 3 Secures Lasting Protections

As the IOC deliberates schedules, Missouri must act decisively. Our SAFE Act prohibits medical gender interventions for minors until 2027—but absent constitutional enforcement, judicial activists and external agitators will erode it. Amendment 3 in 2026 ensures:

  • Permanent ban on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for all Missouri children

  • Reversal of 2024's abortion overreach, eliminating pathways for state-funded gender procedures

  • Required medically accurate disclosures—free from ideological distortion on risks or outcomes

Cole County has validated the ballot text. The ACLU and Planned Parenthood are organizing. Recent election shifts underscore the left's resurgence—we must respond with superior mobilization.

The Olympics required years and global condemnation to recognize reality. Missouri parents insist on immediate, unbreakable safeguards.

Partner in the Effort: Fortify Amendment 3 Today

MO Protects is executing statewide operations—door-to-door outreach, educational events, and if we can raise the funds, precision advertising. Your involvement is essential for success.

Invest now at moprotects.org/give Each contribution advances a pro-life, pro-family, and pro-sanity vision for our state.

If the IOC can figure this out, surely Missouri can too.

#YesOn3 | #ProtectGirlsSports

Next
Next

When Hospitals Hide the Truth: What the Dignity Health Scandal Teaches Us About Amendment 3